Financial district architecture
Representative Matters

Capital deployed. Control preserved.

Representative matters illustrating how Recourse Capital has helped Canadian companies and law firms pursue meritorious claims. Details are illustrative and anonymized to protect client confidentiality.

Case Study 01

Preserving Operating Capital

Corporate headquarters skyline
Client
Industrial engineering company
Dispute
AAA arbitration over supplier professional malpractice
Funding
$2.5M in fees and expenses

Challenge

The company faced a high-value, multi-year dispute that was damaging its reputation and cash flow. It needed to preserve operating capital for day-to-day business rather than redirecting it to legal fees.

Solution

Recourse Capital provided non-recourse funding covering all arbitration-related fees and expenses. The company retained full control of the arbitration strategy and settlement authority.

Impact

The company pursued a critical recovery at no cost, preserving cash flow for operations while the arbitration proceeded.

Case Study 02

Class Action Adverse Costs Protection

Courthouse facade
Client
Representative plaintiff, privacy class action
Dispute
Breach of privacy against major telecommunications provider
Funding
Costs indemnity up to $5M

Challenge

Ontario’s loser-pays costs regime exposed the representative plaintiff to potentially catastrophic adverse costs awards, creating a barrier to pursuing a meritorious claim on behalf of thousands of consumers.

Solution

Recourse Capital provided a costs indemnity and disbursement funding. The agreement was structured to satisfy Ontario’s Class Proceedings Act, section 33.1, and was submitted for court approval.

Impact

The class action proceeded with the representative plaintiff fully protected against adverse costs, enabling access to justice for the class members.

Case Study 03

Claim Monetization

Client
Publicly traded technology company
Dispute
Opt-out antitrust claim
Funding
$15M monetization advance

Challenge

The company had a large, meritorious antitrust claim but was under quarterly earnings pressure. Management needed to improve liquidity without settling prematurely.

Solution

Recourse Capital advanced $15 million against the expected recovery from the opt-out claim. The capital was non-recourse and did not appear as debt on the balance sheet.

Impact

Immediate cash infusion improved quarterly liquidity. The company retained full control of the litigation and pursued the claim to its optimal resolution.

Case Study 04

Judgment Enforcement

Client
Oil and gas executive
Dispute
Contract judgment against well-heeled defendant
Funding
$4M in enforcement costs

Challenge

The plaintiff won a significant verdict, but the defendant used multi-jurisdictional structuring to avoid payment while continuing to live conspicuously.

Solution

Recourse Capital funded the legal and investigative costs of enforcement proceedings across multiple jurisdictions, tracing assets and securing freezing orders.

Impact

Sustained enforcement pressure resulted in near-total recovery for the plaintiff.

Your matter could be next

If you hold a high-value claim, judgment, or arbitration award, we can structure capital around it without adding debt or ceding control.